TOPIC OF THE WEEK: From handshakes to hard cash
Marco Rubio’s visit to Uzbekistan and the C5+1 ministerial in Samarkand have brought renewed attention to Central Asia’s efforts to attract Western investment. Yet the economic significance of this opening depends less on the nationality of investors than on the financing, commercial arrangements and implementation of individual projects.
In this report I look at a selective sample of commercial engagements in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan to gauge whether new international partners can strengthen host country's negotiating position by expanding the range of available investment partners. One key observation is that, despite this newly added clout, processing may remain abroad, sales may stay controlled by a foreign company, and financing may never materialize. Another particularly interesting, and possibly unexpected, conclusion is that Western and Gulf involvement does not automatically produce better domestic outcomes than Chinese or Russian projects. The strongest argument for Central Asia's opening is not necessarily that Western investors offer better deals, but that having more competing partners could allow Central Asian governments to negotiate better deals with everyone—including China and Russia.
From an investor perspective, this should help distinguish commercial announcements, likely driven by geopolitical motives, from projects that can really improve earnings, exports, electricity supply or public finances. For example, operating power plants already deliver tangible benefits, while many touted minerals deals remain longer-term possibilities.
The key takeaway is that Central Asian opening has indeed delivered real economic benefits, albeit only in selected areas. It has added useful capacity, but evidence of uneven FDI and unfinished projects mean that a broader improvement in growth and economic diversification has yet to be demonstrated. One practical lesson may be to assign more weight to projects that already have allocated financing, actual production, and locally retained income rather than to ones that are defined more by investor’s nationality or the announced dollar amount.
Now read on...
Register to sample a report